On February 12, 2026, Rep. Ro Khanna posted a document on X that displays an email with the subject line "I beat Bush" addressed to Jeffrey Epstein, calling for the sender’s identity to be unredacted. You can read more about that here: https://x.com/reprokhanna/status/2022046192478327156 This market will resolve to the individual whose email account is confirmed to have sent the specified message by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. If no individual's email account is confirmed to have sent the message by the end date, this market will resolve to "Not revealed in 2026". The identity of the account must be revealed unambiguously, for example, through a public unredaction of the document in question, which clearly and definitively reveals the sender’s address. Official statements regarding the sender’s identity, or any confirmation that does not involve public unredaction of the specified document, including access limited to House members, congressional committees, or other restricted parties, will qualify only if there is a broad consensus as to their truthfulness. The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
24H VOLUME
$2.0K
LIQUIDITY
$2.0K
BALANCE
$0
Comments (5)

Earningg Mar 14
Epstein client list released by June 30?
389254 Feb 16
if you can do basic research you know its gwendolyn. plain and simple. the questions is, if the redaction retards at the DOJ/FBI will unredact it or keep lying as always
ImNotBetting Feb 15
These options are really bad. It was clearly a local Iowa politician

DFK Feb 13
Chill bro. If Yes "not revealed" wins, No everything else also does.
PassiveStrike Feb 13
Da fuq does this mean for individual names? "If no individual's email account is confirmed to have sent the message by the end date, this market will resolve to "Not revealed in 2026". Do both "yes" and "no" positions lose if no name is revealed? That cant be right...




