This market will resolve according to the named people who attend Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's wedding. If no wedding between Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce occurs by December 31, 2026, 11:59PM ET, this market will resolve to "No". the resolution source for this market will be photographic or video evidence of the event, or by statements from Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce, the attendee, or their legal or social media representatives. Only physical attendance of the event will qualify; virtual attendance or confirmation of an invitation will not count.
24H VOLUME
$12
LIQUIDITY
$12
BALANCE
$0
Comments (50)
iutwpfal Sep 16
It's the eternal question
Poivre Sep 13
I just called Max Martin he wasn't there
iutwpfal Aug 16
Lmao
Zenef Aug 2
then why did you sell the winning YES ?
iwillfknmakeitt Jul 30
no you dont lmao other people didn't have a photo there and still resolved yes ur fried
0x929a8Eb9bE3Dc9Fa54970F10b8195766F1095ab4-1774939223503 Jul 29
Read the rules: you didn't bet on whether he went, but on whether there's photos and/or a statement confirming that he did.
iwillfknmakeitt Jul 27
wtf is this? he literally went , sure there's not much proof but its a fact that he went lmao
iwillfknmakeitt Jul 27
he was literally there lmao
S888 Jul 20
No, it seems bugged, he is right
thx4playing Jul 20
no was proposed, the disputer disputed that it should not be a no, and it won
0x1d08deDaB8F8db00B7Bedf802C116Cbcc0803F18-1782869127151 Jul 20
why would it be no? there is time until december 31 for evidence. so yes or more time
gpredicts Jul 20
outcome disputed twice, it went to final review, time passed, now its back to outcome proposed?
paced Jul 18
umm why is it rising again?
tiongbu Jul 17
YE ATTENDED
0xBdE37A19aAb4EBaEFAf7263E7C6010982f6e317f-1773683866961 Jul 17
perps: 00jbvof3
CosmicCedar Jul 16
Should get some photos from Taylor at some point soon...
aenews-hive Jul 15
cope
memetal Jul 13
event didnt allow photos. the mahomes posted a pic before the wedding on their instagram, they dressed up to go the wedding, and it was reported on many news sites they attended, their instagram literally says and has photo of it.
masnjr Jul 13
What a fckin scam
masnjr Jul 13
Egregious missresolves. The rules are clear what the resolution source is and for the mahomes there is no photographic evidence of them in the event.
0x58cC1547a0F833503da4CFFB8Bd584c1Ab807398-1783201377041 Jul 13
Perps code: 019tfswu
paulaabdul Jul 12
wen jail von adrew tate?
MeNoDatNutReelMuni Jul 12
If everyone stays silent then it will resolve to No
blvcksun Jul 10
Andrés Tate was there Fam
0x2c94C1b77B79BD93138ac31544A9C5916701551C-1779272438749 Jul 10
Ok so there’s videos and photos surfacing of Lana Del Rey hosting a birthday party in LA at the time of the wedding
deepsundardatta Jul 10
agreed
masnjr Jul 8
Confirmation of their relationship had to come as a direct statement from them. Despite there being photos of them kissing and them together at events, they never made an official statement of their relationship so the market resolved to NO.
NoSECMeansFreeMoney Jul 8
what happened in the perry x trudeau market?
masnjr Jul 8
Why would it? Rules are very clear. Look up the katy perry x trudeau dating market. Something similar happened there.
Doggieson Jul 8
I guess this market will continue to swing down, until a real album of pictures or videos from Taylor or Travis come out, which is unknown to happen or these celebrities admit that they went to the wedding.
FreeMoneyEasy Jul 8
It gonna resolved 50-50 imo
MemeLoverOfficial Jul 8
Yes holders obviously don't want to sell unless they absolutely have to which is fair enough
May4th Jul 8
But why is Gracie the only one that plummeted so far?
MemeLoverOfficial Jul 7
I agree, she was there, but it doesn't matter. Read the rules - there needs to be a photo / video of her there, or a direct statement from one of the listed people. The market can't resolve "Yes" until that proof becomes available
Machiavellian Jul 7
Brittany was there! All over Web...
MemeLoverOfficial Jul 6
Not sure why she did this. Maybe she just wanted this moment to stay private. Maybe it's the opposite and she's convinced people to sign a filming NDA so she can release the wedding as a concert film. But she's definitely chosen to keep people silent for as long as she possibly can
MemeLoverOfficial Jul 6
Gracie Abrams dips from 99.6% to 77% - sure this will keep happening on the other markets over next couple days as market processes that Taylor has sworn people to a psychotic NDA and that she'll absolutely demolish them if they discuss the wedding publicly for even a single second
Irondrake69 Jul 6
K al shi is less strict so then means here is less chance than kal
meteorC Jul 6
The rules market operations differ between the two.
Irondrake69 Jul 6
just check k .alshi, way ahead and more open for sources, if it says No on k .alshi is No definitly here
0x12FCc5Dd1cFE556EAEe7c592C1f488b78D7F3a22-1773206920815 Jul 5
Jared Goff? Why is he on here lol
masnjr Jul 5
The kaIhsi bet has very different rules and resolution source. Just because that one resolved to yes does not mean this one will. Its not uma manipulation. Its basic reading. The rules are very clear what the resolution source is.
masnjr Jul 5
Ngl bro your bets are pretty retarded. This wedding has been extremely secretive where guests had to sign NDA’s and could not take cameras inside. The rules are very clear that the resolution source is photographic evidence of the event or direct statements explicitly mentioning they were there. Its very hard to prove anyone was there under that resolution criteria. And bonding at 98c+ is extremely stupid
masnjr Jul 5
My brother in christ there is no way to propose NO until december 31st.
Doggieson Jul 5
No actual evidence as of date
Doggieson Jul 5
Propose no for all asap
Doggieson Jul 4
Will anyone propose yes or no?
Elver-Galarga Jul 4
Lana del rey was free money
Luck7.7.7 Jul 4
donald trump ?😂
0x88C6F8CaaDB38b63956b2D305ad15fb84022245B-1762946398910 Jul 4
kanye pls
