This market will resolve to “Yes” if files which were not previously public and which pertain to the illegal activities of Jeffrey Epstein are made public by December 31, 2025, 11:59 PM ET, and those files contain a list of individuals associated with Epstein in connection with his illegal activities, including but not limited to sex trafficking or related crimes. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.” To qualify, the files must contain names in a context equivalent to what is commonly referred to as Epstein’s “client list”—that is, a document that explicitly identifies a list or set of individuals as being directly connected to, participating in, facilitating, funding, soliciting, or otherwise being implicated in Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal activities. A document may qualify even if it does not contain explicit incriminating language on its face, so long as credible reporting or accompanying official context confirms that the released document is an incriminating client list or functionally equivalent roster of individuals tied to Epstein’s illegal activity. The following will not qualify: - Flight logs, passenger manifests, visitor logs, or transportation records which merely show individuals traveling with, meeting with, or visiting Epstein without any explicit or contextual tie to criminal activity. - Contact books, address lists, social calendars, guest lists, schedules, correspondence logs, or similar documents that include names solely due to social contact, proximity, acquaintance, or logistical interaction with Epstein. - Any document listing individuals without accompanying language, context, or credible reporting that connects those individuals to Epstein’s illegal activity. The primary resolution sources for this market will be the released files themselves and a consensus of credible reporting.
24H VOLUME
$0
LIQUIDITY
$0
BALANCE
$0
Comments (50)
Hawk-x Jun 12
If they say no to this, only an actual Epstein client list is enough for them, even though it says in the rules is dosent have to be. there is actually no way if they read the rules and the case that they can say no.
Hawk-x Jun 12
Yes the Norwegian case did meet the requirement's, but this is an even more clear yes. There is actually no good argument against it.
vortl Jun 12
Actually, the three Norwegians already fully meet the YES. It's just that the people who control the settlement system are a bunch of idiots.
Hawk-x Jun 9
New public file released ✅ Names identified in the file ✅ Not a flight log, visitor log, contact book, or social calendar ✅ Names not included merely because of association or proximity to Epstein ✅ Official congressional context surrounding the names ✅ DOJ referral based on information contained in the testimony ✅ Rules explicitly allow a "functionally equivalent roster" and do NOT require a document literally titled "Epstein Client List" ✅ If all of the above is true, what part of the resolution criteria is still missing?
Hawk-x Jun 5
Check the rules, I am not able for some reason to write long texts
💰💰 Jun 4
it's witness testimony, why do you think it qualifies?
Hawk-x Jun 4
Clear yes
Hawk-x Jun 4
Google Sarah Kellen transcritpt, can't send link for some reasonon
0x40724FF9c89E6e01CE644ed16B6e001562b5541d-1778395744046 Jun 4
Link?
Hawk-x Jun 4
Check House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Hawk-x Jun 4
They released it
yzzkhant May 25
I hope I will not in that list. God, please help me. NOOOO
PotatoPixie May 23
[link removed]
Rigorous May 23
Epstein client list:[link removed]
HokiHoki May 19
GL
Rigorous May 15
[link removed]
Hawk-x May 14
[link removed]
Justadudem May 9
Man i too bought yes did I do the right thing
0x64AA3F2869DE45F6121f6760288432D19681E774-1763311387317 May 6
Fundamentals model diverges here.
Hawk-x May 4
Norway’s parliament will hold a public control hearing on the Epstein case on May 11–12, triggered by the released documents and ongoing investigations by Økokrim.
taerv534 Apr 25
The YES proposal failed on the grounds that nothing has been released yet that would qualify for this market. So YES will lose and NO will win on June 30th, unless something new comes out that qualifies
taerv534 Apr 25
The YES proposal failed on the grounds that nothing has been released yet that would qualify for this market. So YES will lose and NO will win on June 30th, unless something new comes out that qualifies.
Alecgsm Apr 24
I don’t understand, what is happening now ?
KovMat Apr 24
Whats happening with this?
taerv534 Apr 23
Tell me more, what's on April 27?
SimonPac Apr 23
Daaamn, pedo war incoming
Rigorous Apr 23
[link removed]
Rigorous Apr 22
At present, a large number of people have already been exposed; these individuals clearly participated in Epstein's illegal activities. What is still missing is only a document containing the names of 3 [link removed]://[link removed] Judicial agency reports from governments around the world, U.S. Department of Justice files, congressional committee investigation reports, compilations from groups of victims, Epstein's and these individuals' transfer records, and so [link removed] someone could provide a document containing the names of people who purchased illegal items from Epstein, that would be even better.
Xxsocute556 Apr 22
april 27 guys
KovMat Apr 22
Whats happening?
4631874368 Apr 22
Hi, I'm following you. Would you mind dropping a mail to hello123456123456@[link removed] ? I'd like to discuss your strategy, thanks. Sorry but this is the only way I came up with to contact you.
Ogden.Candi Apr 21
Can we just finish this? What the fuck?
EPIC.FAILURE Apr 20
good
EPIC.FAILURE Apr 20
can someone post a link to the client list in chat pls
EPIC.FAILURE Apr 20
its fucked if this resolves as a yes
0xCa5Dda8eDf23b102027ce077c18d8105BD8b6ed9-1771201484833 Apr 20
It’s deemed a P4 too early GG
Xxsocute556 Apr 20
its prob going to be a yes, pretty rigged tbh
0xC59F322EA77A8F9700b555F016414C4Ccc8a59Ab-1747688890263 Apr 20
always the manipulated markets smh....
Xxsocute556 Apr 20
wheres the final review?
taerv534 Apr 20
He will be back again in another month to try it again
bamesjond Apr 19
He deleted all his comments too lol
HokiHoki Apr 19
lol
EPIC.FAILURE Apr 19
also this should resolve as a no or at least be extended to the actual date specified
EPIC.FAILURE Apr 19
if you are not a millionair the promis wasnt for you
iutwpfal Apr 19
I made money but I still feel cheated
0xCa5Dda8eDf23b102027ce077c18d8105BD8b6ed9-1771201484833 Apr 19
Never follow others their promises, always do your own research
0xCa5Dda8eDf23b102027ce077c18d8105BD8b6ed9-1771201484833 Apr 19
Spurs5555 (before known as NEVERsellYES) has been awfully quiet + selling his yes shares haha
Ricopapi Apr 19
Yes
Nadmi Apr 19
I got into this market with the guarantee of 8x return I have read all over Polymarket. Where is my return? is this a scam?🤡
bamesjond Apr 19
lmao
